Unbelievable as it may seem at first to those who know Lee Child's work, Tom Cruise is in talks to play the six-foot-five protagonist, Jack Reacher. And yet, The Guardian reports that Child himself has expressed eagerness for Cruise to take the part. "Reacher's size in the books is a metaphor for an unstoppable force, which Cruise portrays in his own way," said Child, in answer to fans who felt Cruise might be too diminutive for the role.
Personally, I think this could work. Tom Cruise is more than a pretty face (which, incidentally, is nowadays lined with character), he's also a pretty damned good actor. Anybody who doesn't know it yet, should watch the arty drama Magnolia (1999) in which Cruise plays a bad-ass bad ass. And Rainman (1988), for which he should have got an Oscar. And Born On The 4th Of July, for which he got an Oscar nomination as well as the Golden Globe Award.
Jack Reacher is a complex character. He's a Batman-style vigilante, a logical strategist, a champion shooter, a loner, a compassionate man, a cold-blooded killer. Now I ask you this: who can portray all that on the silver screen, without looking like all brawn and no brain, without appearing a wimp or a killing machine or an action hero?
14 comments:
Yvonne,
You are painfully wrong.
To anyone who has read more than a few of the Reacher books, and considers themself a fan, casting Cruise for the role is sacrilege. Reacher's size/mass is one of the most consistent and fundamental characteristics.
Child's comments smack of a total sell-out. His attempt to wave-off the disparity between what he's written and the casting of Cruise sounds like a man enamored by a growing bank account, not someone with integrity.
Cast Dwayne Johnson or Ray Stevenson.
As someone who's read the books and considers herself a fan, I beg to differ. Yeah, Reacher's size is an important visual clue throughout the series. But so is his wanderlust, his lack of material possessions, his lonesomeness, his willingness to fight injustices big and small, his prowess in a brawl, his intelligence, his ability to sense the time of day (not mentioned in all the books), his integrity, his reluctance to be tied down to place or person.
Now, if out of all that the creators of the movie had to remove one thing, is his size really his most defining characteristic? Frankly, I'd be more upset if they gave him a suitcase full of clothes.
Look, I'm not saying the movie's going to be a guaranteed success. If they treat it as yet another Mission Impossible instalment, we're doomed. But that won't be determined by how tall the lead actor is.
You cannot discount size as a prime delineator in the persona of Reacher. Like it or not, a physical presence enables a frontal approach to any situation where violence is a by=product; and if your hero does not take the frontal approach he is not Jack Reacher. Please lose Tom Cruise.
Nothing wrong with Tom Cruise just that he look very much like a kid. I would very much prefer Steven Seagal_ he got the look and the build.
well played Mr. Seagal but unfortunately Mr. Cruise has snagged the role. And yes size does matter....too bad could have at least used someone six foot tall.
Cannot think of a worse actor to play Jack Reacher. The fact that Tom Cruise is half Reacher's size is beside the point, he doesn't come close to the charisma required. Have been eager to see these books made into movies, but couldn't force myself to sit through an hour and a half of a half size, half assed so called actor like this
i think jim caviezel who plays reese on person of interest would be a better choice to play jack reacher.
Channing Tatum is Jack Reacher. Big ,Nordic looking. Looks like an Army guy. He has a calm quality. Quiet confidence. Tom Cruise has none of these qualities, so so disappointing to Reacher fans !
Gerard Butler, Jason Statham, Sullivan Stapleton
Gerard Butler, Jason Statham or Sullivan Stapleton would have been better choices
Alexander Skaarsgaard should get the job: Height (6.4), physical stature (see Tarzan), blond hair, blue eyes, has played a soldier on film before (Generation Kill), badass (True Blood), has youth on his side, so can play the part for years to come, and most importantly, he can act.
In an ideal world I think a young Clint Eastwood would have been perfect, as he has the screen presence, one suspects, Child might have had in mind, consciously or unconsciously, when he imagined the character.
Unfortunately, there is no actor working today, who is not nearly, as old as Clint, who can produce anything like that kind of screen presence, and physically, with the right styling, Skaarsgaard, is the closest physically, to Clint and how I imagine Reacher.
My advice to him would be to watch some Clint Eastwoord movies, the Spaghetti westerns, Josey Whales, Dirty Harry, etc... to get an idea of what's required, and to be fair to Tom, he should look at the Reacher films, because Tom did a good job of channelling the Reacher badass attitude.
The problem, as Child has said, is that Tom didn't have the physicality, that needed to go with that attitude, to create that sense of immediate intimidation, one associates with Reacher.
alexander skarsgard or joel kinnaman
Yes Sullivan Stapleton would be good. He has the physical presence, very action man but also has the quiet and stillness of Jack Reacher. He is also a good actor. Jack Reacher is not totally action man. The actor needs to be able to be both emotionally present when needed and able to have a presence without saying a thing. He has to have a military bearing. The height and build and the way Reacher is described by Lee Child should be sought. I could not believe that Tom Cruise played Reacher. He is short. He only plays Tom Cruise in another action movie and frankly without a shirt he looks like an old man trying to look young.
Kenu Reeves
Post a Comment